Proven Not Trigger Cell Phone Brain Cancer

A large-scale studies show no link between long-term mobile phone use with an increased risk of brain tumors. The study conducted by researchers from Denmark was conducted on 35,000 mobile phone users who were monitored for 18 years.

Previous studies suggest a link between mobile phone use and tumors are considered unfinished because no long term studies.

Earlier in June, the world health organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) states that electromagnetic radio frequencies released by cell phones may be carcinogenic in humans.

But the theory was disproved by research done by researchers from Denmark. The study was conducted by comparing the cancer risk that is owned by the owners of mobile phones in Denmark (approximately 420 000) people, with the entire population in Denmark.

Patrizia Frei, a postdoctoral researcher and member of the Danish Cancer Society is conducting this research, analyze health data belongs to 358,403 mobile phone users between 1990 and 2007. Generally diagnosed with a tumor in the central nervous system of 10,729 people.

However, in people who use mobile phones in the long term (more than 13 years), the incidence of cancer is almost the same with people who do not use the phone.

"Follow-up studies of long-allowed us to investigate the effects of mobile phones in people who use more than 10 years. It turns out this is not related to cancer risk," researchers said.

However, according to them the results of this study may not apply to the possibility of increased cancer risk for very heavy cell phone users or those who used their phones for more than 15 years.

"Further study with larger populations is essential to eliminate bias and investigate for sure," he said.

Currently there are an estimated 5 billion mobile phone users around the world and the numbers will continue to rise. Besides the amount of time people spend an estimated cell phone use is also increasing.

IARC itself recommends the use of SMS or features hands-free wear earphones to reduce cell phone radiation exposure.

Missing Baby Lisa Parents Not Answering Vital Questions, Police Say

The parents of missing toddler Lisa Irwin haven't submitted to an interview with detectives for the last 10 days to answer questions about things "they might only know," police said today.

The 11-month-old girl vanished from her crib Oct. 3. Police have not named any suspects in the girl's disappearance, but the story of mother Deborah Bradley has altered somewhat and she has admitted to being drunk that night, possibly even blacking out.

Kansas City Police Capt. Steve Young expressed some frustration today with Bradley and the girl's father, Jeremy Irwin.

"There are things the detectives need to flesh out with the parents that only they would know and we no longer have that opportunity to sit down with them," Young told ABC News this afternoon. "We have not had an unrestricted conversation since Oct. 8th."

"And that time, and previous times, there came a point when Deborah became uncomfortable and stopped the questioning," Young said.

Young conceded that the parents have spoken with detectives since Oct. 8, but only to clarify information about tips that have come in.

He said the contact has been limited to conversations about details that need to be cleared up such as, "Do you know this person?"

"We strongly believe that that parent's cooperation and involvement is critical [in finding Lisa]," Young said.

Baby Lisa's Parents Not Answering Some Questions

Police have previously accused the parents of halting their cooperation, although the parents have insisted they continue to answer officers' questions. Today's comments by police were more specific.

Young also bristled today at criticism by Joe Tacopina, the high powered defense lawyer who is now representing Bradley and Irwin.

Tacopina told "Good Morning America" today that the way some of the local authorities conducted themselves in the hours following Lisa's disappearance was "baffling."

"I am aware that he offered some vague criticisms of the police department," Young said. "I think all reasonable people know that are doing things and we know things that are not a matter of public record."

"Should we develop something that we think will benefit the case by making public, by all means we'll be doing that," the captain said. "But to make the assumption that we're putting all our eggs in one basket would be wildly inaccurate."

Tacopina has also expressed his desire for more "boots on the ground" efforts to search for the girl, although police have been conducting searches every day since Lisa's disappearance in places including woods, fields, landfills, drainage areas, abandoned houses and a well.

Young said the police have so far cleared over 550 tips and leads.

The captain's comments about the parents and their lawyer came as questions grew over how much Bradley drank on the night Lisa disappeared. After store surveillance video showed her buying a box of wine that day, she initially admitted to drinking some wine. That has escalated to her concession she drank enough to be drunk and most recently to the possiblity that she blacked out from intoxication.

"Blacking out is a scientific term and I don't know if we can say that, but she had some wine that night," Tacopina told "Good Morning America" today. "And don't forget, it was Deborah who said that when she put Lisa to bed she had wine."

Tacopina said that there was no video or evidence of his client drinking, so there would have been no need for her to be so forthcoming if she had anything to hide.

"I was drinking, but it has nothing to do with my daughter's disappearance," Bradley told "GMA."

Tacopina also defended the perceived "inconsistencies" in Bradley's timeline after the interviews she gave Monday. For the past two weeks, she had been saying that the last time she saw Lisa was when she put her to bed at 10:30 p.m. On Monday, Bradley said she put Lisa to bed at 6:30 p.m., almost four hours earlier than previously stated.

"There's not a four-hour gap," Tacopina said. "There's not because what she said was she put the baby to bed at around 6:30 p.m. At one point during the 13 hours of [police] interviews, she has said she believed she checked on her at 10:30 p.m. It's not an inconsistency."

"It may be a recollection refreshed at some later point, but it's certainly not material to whether or not she had anything to do with the disappearance of her baby," he said.

Declared Not Guilty After 25 Years imprisoned

A worker in a grocery store in Williamson, north of Austin, who was jailed for 25 years for allegedly murdering his wife, declared free after DNA tests proved that he is not killing the perpetrator. Similarly told AP on Wednesday (10/05/2011).

A man named Michael Morton (57) was convicted of murdering his wife, Christine, in August 1986. His lawyer said the investigation team and investigators to hide the evidence from those who can free him from prison.

In his testimony, Morton insisted that he leave his wife and 3 year old son in the morning to work and rejected accusations that if he killed his wife.

However, the investigation team composed allegations mentioned if Morton kill his wife for refusing sex with him after celebrating the birthday-32.

By using DNA techniques not available at court Morton in 1987, the authorities managed to detect DNA on a bandana filled Christine's blood spills near Morton's house after the murder along with a killer whose name is not mentioned. DNA testing is done by the nonprofit Innocence Project, which specializes in DNA testing, the court's decision is wrong.

Some evidence is hidden, among others, a police interview with the child Morton said that the attacker was not his father as well as credit cards and checks used his wife after she died.

Due to the error the verdict against him, the lawyer will file a rehabilitation Morton's good name and proposed compensation of 80,000 dollars per year while he was in prison.

Not Fair Treatment for Iran Air

State airline Iran Air criticized the International Aviation Association (IATA), which prohibits the company uses a ticket system of international payment services. The criticism appeared in the news Press TV on Tuesday (11/10/2011) in Tehran.

 

illustration

 

 Because of the prohibition of the use of international ticketing service system, Iran Air international flight bookings lost opportunities.

IATA yesterday said the ban was part of the international sanctions the United States (U.S.) against Iran. Because of the ban, Iran Air international flight bookings lost opportunity.

According to Director of Civil Aviation Organization of Iran Frahad Parvaresh, IATA policy clearly violates international law. "The ban also violated its own IATA regulations," he protested.

Besides, he added Parvaresh, IATA had no obligation to run the U.S. sanctions. "We see, U.S. pressing IATA," he said while adding, until now Iran Air IATA pay membership dues.
Western countries, including the U.S. and the EU, indeed impose sanctions on Iran because the country was considered insists its uranium enrichment program run. Opponents party considers Iran a nuclear weapon would create deadly.

 

 

Slovakia Will Not Put anti-missile

Slovak President Ivan Gasparovic.

Slovak President Ivan Gasparovic asserted his country would not participate as one of where to place anti-missile defense system in Europe missile shield program was initiated by the United States and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

Gasparovic said it was in a special interview session with some selected media, including Kompas, Jakarta, Tuesday (10/11/2011). He is the first Slovak head of state visit to Indonesia, with the aim of reviving the intimacy of the relationship in the era of Czechoslovakia.

Associated with U.S. plans to hold anti-missile defense system equipment throughout Europe, Gasparovic said that Slovakia is a member of NATO and the respect and support any decision made defense pact. However, it did not make the Slovaks are willing to host one of the placement of such anti-missile system.

"Slovakia is a NATO member countries. In NATO, we apply the (system) shared decision-making, and Slovakia supports all efforts of NATO. However, in terms of placement of equipment (anti-missile) anything in any location, Slovakia will not participate. The plan is not like that. However, Slovakia remains a supporter of any NATO plan, "said Gasparovic, who spoke to reporters through an intermediary translator English.

Gasparovic added that negotiations between the parties related to NATO and the Russian side plans of deploying anti-missile defense system is very important in ensuring world peace in the future. "NATO is trying to find the best consensus between NATO and Russia because, once consensus is reached, there will be a guarantee of world peace in the future," said Gasparovic.

Russia objected to the plan of placing anti-missile system is due to assume the defense system is aimed against Russia. While NATO insists, anti-missile defense system is not aimed at Russia, but from the threats the country "rogue" who has the ability to make medium-range ballistic missiles, such as Iran and North Korea.

Some countries in central and eastern Europe, like Romania, Poland, and Turkey, have expressed willingness, both the location and placement of anti-missile missile systems the U.S. radar system, as part of a European missile shield program.